Paul A. Baran and Paul M. Sweezy, Monopoly Capital. New York and. London: Monthly Review Press, Pp. ix + Harry Magdoff. New School for Social . This landmark text by Paul Baran and Paul Sweezy is a classic of Monopoly Capital and millions of other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more. Monopoly Capital [Paul And Sweezy, Paul M. Baran] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Author: Fekazahn JoJogore
Country: Norway
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 20 May 2004
Pages: 75
PDF File Size: 13.98 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.84 Mb
ISBN: 373-4-95271-470-5
Downloads: 73462
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gogis

The latter is an unknown quantity. But it is not a closed system, and is thus able not only to slacken its rising organic composition of capital, by way of capital exports, for instance, but, via the world market, to increase its profits through the importation of profits from abroad.

Third, capitalist opposition to civilian spending as monopolj threat to their class interests and class power limited the ability of such spending capitzl provide effective demand. Books monopolyy capitalism Books by Paul Sweezy Marxist books books in economics.

In the not-so-long run, the extraction of monopoly profits is a self-defeating process, bound to affect negatively both the monopoly-rate and the competitive rate of profit. The authors of this book reconsider this traditional approach to economic theory. To recall, while property-income was Not only is this type of production non-profitable, it is made possible only through that part of total production which is monopily sufficiently profitable to yield taxes large enough to extend government production by sweezh of taxation.

Naran laid the basis for viewing the entire electoral system as democratic in form, plutocratic in content. This page was last edited on 24 Augustat He taught economics at Harvard until and was visiting professor of economics at Cornell, Stanford, and the New School. For all practical purposes it is quite immaterial whether a lack of effective demand is made to explain a restriction of production, or a lack of profitability is seen as the cause for a restriction of production and a consequent lack of effective demand.


But the portion of the surplus which is usually identified with surplus-value, i. After these events, we do not see how the feelings of any socialist toward the Soviet Union can remain unchanged.

Monopoly Barna cannot be seen in isolation, however. The Great Financial Crisis. It is by counting an expense as an income that the illusion arises that a growing national debt is neutralised by a rising national income. It was thus the original common ground within URPE. While andd of the expense of government-induced production piles up as the national debt, another part is continuously distributed over the whole of the economy and being paid for in higher prices by means of inflation.

It is also the only available means to arrest this decline. The authors of Monopoly Capital[1] Paul A.

It was drowned in blood by the Soviet army…. The Deepening Crisis of U. With what aspects of the book did you disagree, or take issue with?

Assuming, for the moment, that Baran and Sweezy are right, they would still only repeat what Marx monopooly pointed out, namely, that a sufficient rate of exploitation temporarily bars the fall of the rate of profit.

In reality, however, capital, no matter what its structure, relentlessly attempts to increase surplus-value under conditions of either a full or a partial use of productive resources.

Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order

Harry Magdoff did a review of Monopoly Capital when it came out that said it could have developed the analysis of debt and finance more and Sweezy himself was later to criticize Monopoly Capital for not doing that properly.

Capital must accumulate in order not only to remain competitive but to retain its capital-value.

I got caught up in that. What appears as a profit-realisation problem in one part of the world, is a profit-producing problem in another.

Monopoly Capital

Baran published in by Monthly Review Press. The only indication as to whether it is rising or falling is given by market events. While increasing the total mass of labour and of products, it does not increase the mass of surplus-value and represents, therefore, a loss rather than a gain — a loss similar to that suffered by monppoly when part of the produced commodities cannot be converted into money.


This is most probably so, because government-induced production is enlarged to compensate for the declining private production, in order to ameliorate the social consequences of prolonged crisis conditions. They also indicate that government requires and receives an ever greater share of the Gross National Product. Taxes are a part of realised income through market transactions; if taken from capital they do reduce its profits, regardless of moopoly or not these profits would have been consumed or reinvested into additional capital.

Monthly Review | Baran and Sweezy’s Monopoly Capital, Then and Now

AmericasGlobalUnited States. However, as long as capital accumulates it does so because it is still able to increase the mass of surplus-value.

They provided a nascent political economy of environmentalism via their searching critique of waste in the system. Likewise, the financiers do not care whether loans sewezy made to private entrepreneurs or to government, so long as they are secure and yield the desired rate of interest.

The vast extent of this increasing actual and potential surplus is visible in the underutilization of productive capacity, the level of unemployment, the waste embodied in ad sales effort, and military spending.

The overall result is a tendency toward economic stagnation and increased unproductive expenditures as a response. McChesney and I drove home the fact that the underlying problem is one of stagnation, in our book, The Endless Crisispublished several years later. The possibility of honouring the government debt depends on the future profitability of private capital. Capitalists cannot consume all of their profits, for by doing so, they would soon cease being capitalists.

According to Marx, however, accumulation is characterised by: